Inner Shallowness and the Morality of Interpretation - Karyo Hliso
Yusuf Begtas:

Inner Shallowness and the Morality of Interpretation

Malfono Yusuf Beğtaş
Inner Shallowness and the Morality of Interpretation

There is a fine but decisive line between looking and seeing. This line radically affects our way of reading events and people. Nevertheless, those who are devoid of depth of heart and social maturity suppose that this line can be crossed solely by the intellect; they do not take into account the share of the heart, conscience, and intention. Yet, a human being perceives the outside world mostly in proportion to the width or narrowness of their own inner world. Everyone shapes what they see according to their own mental vessel; they make sense of it as much as their own scale and evaluate it in accordance with that measure.

For this reason, a significant portion of casual, negative interpretations reflects not reality, but the inner world of the person making the interpretation. Emotion steps ahead, evaluation remains incomplete, and the gaze becomes "ego-centric." The person interprets not what they see, but what they pass through their own filter.

However, a crucial distinction must be made here: interpretations made with shallow and distorted perceptions often cause the fallacy of misassociation. For not every interpretation made with inner shallowness is well-intentioned. Some genuinely stem from a lack of depth; the person speaks from within their shallowness without being aware of it. Yet, some interpretations also carry the deliberate purpose of distortion, overshadowing, and disparagement. That is to say, the matter is not solely a question of capacity, but sometimes of intention as well. Therefore, distorted perceptions are nourished by two sources: a lack of awareness and conscious cunningness.

Interpreting is not only a mental competence, but also a state of moral maturity. For a positive interpretation approaches only hearts that can truly carry it. A jewel is merely a piece of stone to an ordinary eye; it is priceless to a goldsmith. The difference is not in the object, but in the beholder.

Evaluations nourished by the vastness of wisdom produce goodness in life; they pull the person and society upward. In contrast, interpretations nourished by the selfish attitudes of the ego produce harm; they fatigue, pull downward, and debase. A service offered with sincerity and dedication finds its true value only in consciousnesses that discern it. Minds left devoid of the knowledge of the big picture, the guidance of conscience, and the sense of justice, on the other hand, easily take refuge in the shadow of prejudices. In such cases, perception gets ahead of the truth; the constructed delusions are believed, not what is visible.

The virtuous person who cares about human dignity and labour, and possesses constructive impulses, reads another with good intention. They look clean, think clean, act clean. In contrast, in selfish attitudes acting with distorted impulses, prejudices speak. The arrogant supposes everyone is arrogant; the egotistical, everyone is egotistical. Someone devoid of virtue cannot see virtue in another. A liar deems everyone a liar; a thief assumes everyone is an opportunist. A human being, more often than not, sees not the person before them, but the reflection of the mirror within themselves. Therefore, the saying "The person judges others by themselves" overlaps with the concept of projection in psychology.

The word of Christ expresses this reality in a profound manner: "The eye is the lamp of the body. So, if your eye is healthy, your whole body will be full of light, but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness." (Matthew 6:22–23)

The eye here describes not merely physical sight, but the way of looking that illuminates or darkens the inner realm of the human being. For beauty is not in the gaze; it is in the quality of the beholder. The eye that sees beauty actually reflects the beauty within itself. The beauty in the eye is born from the light of the soul. The eye that notices beauty points to a soul carrying beauty and to an awakening. The eye that cannot see looks through the veil of its own darkness. Indeed, "Whatever the essence of the human being is, their eye is that too. The eye is the gate of the heart; if the heart is dirtied, the light of the eye fades as well."

For this reason, beauty is not a quality found solely on the outside; it is closely related to the inner world of the person seeing it. Inner clarity renders the virtue in another clearer. If the inner world is dirty and noisy, the goodness/morality in another becomes virtually invisible. This situation is related to the quality of the looking eye, rather than the object looked at. The person whose mind is narrow and whose heart is blurred, even if they look at the most beautiful landscape, cannot touch the essence of beauty. Because the consciousness of respect, equality, and integrity operating in subject–subject relationships has not yet settled in them.

Nevertheless, the blindest spot of human beings is most of the time precisely here: if a consciousness of "objectification / exploitation–abuse" and a consciousness of self-interest are still operating somewhere inside, the human being reads another through that lens; they may not even realize their own passivity.

Therefore, the matter is not merely what we feel, but with what state of consciousness we come into contact with what we feel.

As inner depth increases, interpretation changes as well. Interpretation ceases to be destructive and becomes developmental. Peace is born more often than not not from refraining from interpretation, but from realizing who we are while interpreting.

Yusuf Beğtaş

 


 
Please Leave Your Thinking

Leave a Comment

You can also send us an email to karyohliso@gmail.com